Study of typology and morphology of stupa variety at the Padepokan Dhammadipa Arama in Malang, East Java

  • Ferlina Sugata Maranatha Christian University
  • Venny Maranatha Christian University
Keywords: Patirupaka, stupa, morphology, typology, replica

Abstract

Religious people generally have a symbol of respect to worship the greatness of role models in their respective religions. This is motivated by different traditions, history, locations, and developments of religion and worship activities that affect the emergence of various types and forms of worship. One of them is a building named stupa. The stupa building as a means of worship accommodates worship activities in Buddhism. The stupa also functions as an object of respect in implementing worship. Padepokan Dhammadipa Ārāma's premises in Malang are architectural stupas buildings similar to the Patirupaka Stupa Shwedagon in Myanmar. Therefore, this study aims to determine the extent to which this replication process occurs in terms of typological and morphological studies, to analyze typology by classifying stupas based on the types of stupas in the world where each culture has its characteristics, and to analyze morphology based on the level of change and tendency of change. The method of this study is a qualitative study with a rationalistic approach. The study results are tabulations of typology and morphology of stupa architecture as a guide for the types and forms of stupa architecture, contributing to the science of Buddhist religious architecture in the Indonesian Archipelago.

References

Anonymous. Buddhist Worship. Srilanka.

Bandaranayake, Senake. 1974. Sinhalese Monastic Architecture, Studies in South Asian Culture Volume IV. Leiden, E.J Brill.

Barker, Chris. 2004. Cultural Studies: Teori & Praktik. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.

Ching, Francis D.K. 1996. Arsitektur, Bentuk, Ruang dan Susunannya. Erlangga: Jakarta.

Diputhera, Oka. 1979. Maha Parinibbana Sutta: Proyek Pengadaan Kitab Suci Buddha. Jakarta.

Fisher, Robert. 1993. Buddhist, Art, and Architecture. London: Thames and Hudson Ltd.

Hall, Stuart. 1997. Representation: Cultural Representation and Signifying Practises. London: Sage

Hameed, H. (2020). Quantitative and qualitative research methods: Considerations and issues in qualitative research. The Maldives National Journal of Research, 8(1), 8-17. https://www.skillsyouneed.com/learn/quantitative-and-qualitative.html

http://filsafat.kompasiana.com/2010/01/30/agama-buddha-bukan-berhala-64704.html accessed on July 29, 2020

http://jordikurni.wordpress.com accessed on July 29, 2020

http://digilib.uinsby.ac.id/907/3/bab%202.pdfhttp://digilib.uinsby.ac.id/907/3/bab%202.pdf accessed on August 11, 2020

http://andcisonline.blogspot.com/2012/05/loporan-studi-komparatif-ke-padepokan.html accessed on August 11, 2020

https://buddhazine.com/melihat-padepokan-dhammadipa-ārāma-batu-malang/ accessed on August 11, 2020.

Mangunwijaya, Y.B.1988. Wastu Citra. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.

Priastana, Dhammasukha Jo. 1994. Pokok-pokok Dasar Mahayana. Jakarta: Yasodhara Puteri.

Sari, Yenni Prisca. 2013. Perkembangan Padepokan Dhammadipa Ārāma di Kota Batu 1971-2007. Thesis, History Education Study Program, Department of History, Faculty of Social Sciences, State University of Malang.

Sangha Mahayana Indonesia. 1991. Kriteria Rumah Ibadah Umat Buddha Mahayana Indonesia, Cetakan I. Jakarta: Majelis Agama Buddha Indonesia.

Subalaratano, Uttamo. Puja. Sangha Theravada Indonesia.

Sylvia Fraser-Lu. Donald M. Stadtner, Buddhist Art of Myanmar, Asia Society Museum, 2015.

Tim Penyusun. 1998. Buku Pelajaran Agama Buddha Sekolah Menengah Tingkat Atas Kelas I. Surabaya: Paramita.

U Win Maung, The Ancestral Stupas of Shwedagon, International Buddhist Conference, Brastagi, Indonesia, 2010.

Wright, Frank Llyod. 1992. Between Principle and Form. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

www.archdaily.com accessed on June 25, 2020.

www.x.furuhitto,st,mt.staffsite.com accessed on July 8, 2020.

www.samaggiphala.or.id accessed on July 8, 2020.

Published
2021-12-30
Section
Articles