The Embodiments of View: Simultaneous and Gradual Approaches in the Contemplative Typology of the Great Perfection
Abstract
The assertion of a state which is unconditioned and beyond temporal change creates unavoidable tensions for any Buddhist account that concerns the shift from worldly experience to a liberated one. The presence of such tensions can be found in the controversy between simultaneous (cig char; yugapad) and gradual (rim gyis; krameṇa) conceptions of the contemplative path and the state of liberation itself. This controversy found its early Tibetan expression in the so-called bSam yas debate, in which representative figures of both approaches argued about basic contemplative and soteriological issues. Later on, Klong chen pa, the renowned 14th century Tibetan teacher, explicated several contemplative typologies that included elements from both approaches. This research belongs to qualitative research using two interpretative perspectives, namely the Pragmatic attitude that focuses on the actual results of the scheme and the Transcendental point of view. The results showed that by examining the typologies and their presuppositions it becomes clear how the efficacy of each approach is closely related to individual capacities of practitioners. As such, the tension between simultaneous and gradual models is revealed as deeply contextual and not binary.
References
Adam, M. T. (2002). Meditation and the Concept of Insight in Kamalaśīla’s Bhāvanākramas. McGill University Libraries.
Ajahn, P., & Ajahn, A. (2009). The Island: An Anthology of the Buddha’s Teaching on Nibbana. Redwood Valley: Abhayagiri Monastic Foundation.
Almogi, O. (2010). Rong-zom-pa’s Discourses on Buddhology: A Study of Various Conceptions of Buddhahood in Indian Sources with Special Reference to the Controversy Surrounding the Existence of Gnosis (jñāna: ye shes) as Presented by the Eleventh-century Tibetan Scholar Rong. Tokyo: The International Institute for Buddhist Studies of the International ….
Arnold, D. (2005). Is Svasa vitti Transcendental? A Tentative Reconstruction Following Ś ntarak ita. Asian Philosophy, 15(1), 77–111.
Bodhi, B. (2001). The middle length discourses of the Buddha: a translation of the Majjhima Nikāya. Delhi: Wisdom Publications.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Clemente, A., & Lukianowicz, A. (1999). The supreme source: the Kunjed Gyalpo [Kun-byed Rgyal-po], the fundamental tantra of Dzogchen Semde. New York: Snow Lion Publications.
Cuevas, B. J. (2005). The hidden history of the Tibetan Book of the Dead. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
D’amato, M. (2005). Three Natures, Three Stages: An Interpretation of the Yogācāra Trisvabhāva-Theory. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 33(2), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-005-0860-y
Davidson, R. M. (1985). Buddhist Systems of Transformation: Āśraya-parivṛtti/-parāvṛtti among the Yogācāra. Berkeley: University of California.
Germano, D. (1994). Architecture and Absence in the Secret Tantric History of the Great Perfection (rdzogs chen). Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 7(2), 203–335.
Germano, D. (1997). The Elements, Insanity, and Lettered Subjectivity. In Religions of Tibet in Practice. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Germano, D. (2007). Food, clothes, dreams, and karmic propensities. Religions of Tibet in Practice: Abridged Edition, 6, 221.
Gomez, L. O. (1983a). Indian Materials on the Doctrine of SuddenEnlightenment. Early Ch’an in China and Tibet, 26(4), 393–434.
Gomez, L. O. (1983b). The Direct and the Gradual Approaches of Zen Master Mahayana: Fragments of the Teachings of Mo-ho-yen. In Studies in Ch’an and Hua-Yen (pp. 69–168). Hawai: University of Hawaii Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824840518-004
Gómez, L. O. (1987). Purifying gold: The metaphor of effort and intuition in Buddhist thought and practice. In Sudden and gradual: Approaches to enlightenment in Chinese thought (pp. 67–165). Hawai: University of Hawaii Press.
Guenther, H. V. (1992). Meditation differently, phenomenological-psychological aspects of Tibetan Buddhist (Mahāmudrā and sNying-Thig) practices from original Tibetan sources. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publisher.
Higgins, D. (2013). The Philosophical Foundations of Classical rDzogs chen in Tibet. Wien: Universität Wien.
Hookham, S. K., & Hookham, S. K. (1991). The Buddha within: Tathagatagarbha doctrine according to the Shentong interpretation of the Ratnagotravibhaga. New York: Suny Press.
Husserl, E. (2012). On the phenomenology of the consciousness of internal time (1893–1917). Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
Jackson, R. R. (1982). Sa skya paṇḍita’s Account of the bSam yas Debate: History as Polemic. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 5(1), 89–99.
James, W. (1987). Writings 1902-1910. New York: Literary Classics of the United States : Distributed to the trade in the U.S. and Canada by the Viking Press.
Karmay, S. G. (1988). The great perfection (rDzogs Chen): A philosophical and meditative teaching of Tibetan Buddhism. Leiden: Brill Publishers.
Klong chen rab Byams-pa. (2009). Tshig don mdzod: GSang ba bla na med pa ’od gsal rdo rje snying po’i gnas gsum gsal bar byed pa’i tshig don rin po che’i mdzod. Pe Cin: Krung go’i bod rig pa dpe krun khang.
Klong chen rab Byams pa. (2009a). Nas lugs mdzod: GNas lugs rin po che’i mdzod. In In Yid bzhin mdzod smad cha dang gnas lugs mdzod (pp. 339–512). Pe Cin: Krung go’i bod rig pa dpe krun khang.
Klong chen rab Byams pa. (2009b). Sems nyid ngal gso’i smad cha. Pe Cin: Krung go’i bod rig pa dpe krun khang.
Klong chen rab Byams pa. (2009c). Theg mchog mdzod II: Theg mchog rin po che’i mdzod smad cha. Pe Cin: Krung go’i bod rig pa dpe krun khang.
Laish, E. (2015). Contemplative Principles of a Non-dual Praxis: the Unmediated Practices of the Tibetan ‘Heart Essence’Tradition. Buddhist Studies Review, 31(2), 215–240.
Liu, M.-W. (1982). The doctrine of the Buddha-nature in the Mahāyāna Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 5(2), 63–94.
Makransky, J. J. (1997). Buddhahood embodied: Sources of controversy in India and Tibet. New York: State University of New York Press.
Mohanty, J. N. (1985). The possibility of transcendental philosophy. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
Moran, D. (2013). Intentionality: Some Lessons from the History of the Problem from Brentano to the Present. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 21(3), 317–358.
Namkhai, N. (1990). The Twenty-One Semdzins of the Dzogchen Upadesha. Merigar: Shang Shung Edizioni.
Ruegg, D. S. (2002). Buddha Nature Mind and the Problem of Gradualism in a Comparative Perspective: On the Transmission and Reception of Buddhism in India and Tibet (Jor). London: Heritage Publishers.
Shaw, S. (2014). The Numerical Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of the Anguttara Nikaya, by Bhikkhu Bodhi. Buddhist Studies Review, 31(2), 313–317.
Śīlabhadra. (1982). Āryabuddhabhūmivyākhyāna (Sangs rgyas kyi sa’i rnam par bshad pa). Delhi: karmapae chodhey gyalwae sungrab partun khang.
Sparham, G., & Schmithausen, L. (1993). Alaya-vijnana: On the Origin and the Early Development of a Central Concept of Yogacara Philosophy. Philosophy East and West, 43(2), 334. https://doi.org/10.2307/1399625
Waldron, W. S. (2003). The Buddhist unconscious: The alaya-vijnana in the context of Indian Buddhist thought. London: Routledge.
Wangchuk, D. (2008). Cross-Referential Clues for a Relative Chronology of Klong chen pa’s Works. Contributions to Tibetan Buddhist Literature, 14(3), 195–244.
Zahavi, D. (2010). Inner (time-) consciousness. In On time-new contributions to the husserlian phenomenology of time (pp. 319–339). Berlin: Springer.
Copyright (c) 2023 Eran Laish
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
