Sharing, Not Saving: Buddhist Values and Digital Philanthropy in the Science for Tibet Campaign

  • Jitka Cirklová Czech Technical University
Keywords: Buddhist values, digital philanthropy, anti-paternalistic philanthropy, Czech–Tibet solidarity, digital solidarity

Abstract

This study analyzes how Buddhist values, digital communication strategies, and reciprocity-based philanthropy (sharing, not saving) are articulated in the Science for Tibet campaign initiated by Brontosauři v Himalájích (BvH). The research focuses on three aspects: how Buddhist values such as inclusivity, interdependence, and harmony with nature shape the organization’s identity; how digital communication strategies are employed within the campaign; and how volunteers and donors interpret sharing as a process of cross-cultural value exchange. Using a qualitative approach through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and digital media analysis, the study finds that Buddhist values are not expressed doctrinally but through everyday practices such as ecological work, cultural preservation, collective learning, and knowledge exchange between Czech volunteers and the community of Mulbekh. The campaign’s communication strategy—which combines humor, everyday narratives, and non-paternalistic representation—proved highly effective in generating public engagement. Volunteers and donors interpret sharing as an equal exchange of knowledge, emotion, and cultural values rather than as a hierarchical act of saving. This study contributes to the development of more ethical, anti-paternalistic, and culturally sensitive models of digital philanthropy and offers novelty through a new analytical framework for value-based philanthropy in transnational contexts.

References

Abeydeera, S., Kearins, K., & Tregidga, H. (2016). Does Buddhism Enable a Different Sustainability Ethic at Work? Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2016(62), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2016.ju.00013

Bártová, Z. (2021). The Buddhist Style in Consumer Culture: From Aesthetics to Emotional Patterns. Journal of Religion in Europe, 14(1–2), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1163/18748929-20211488

Borup, J. (2019). Spiritual capital and religious evolution: Buddhist values and transactions in historical and contemporary perspective. Journal of Global Buddhism, 20, 49–68. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3238217

Buzássyová, B. (2024). Side by Side with Fighting Nations: Making the New Culture of Pro-African Solidarity in the Campaigns of the Czechoslovak Committee for Solidarity with African and Asian Peoples. International Review of Social History, 69, 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859023000688

Cholbi, M. (2010). Kantian paternalism and suicide intervention. In Paternalism: Theory and Practice (pp. 115–133). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139179003.007

Cirklová, J. (2009). Critical Note Development of Interest in Buddhism in the Czech Republic. Journal of Global Buddhism, 10, 5-1 6.

Cirklová, J. (2012). Buddhism as a value source in the course of new identity and lifestyle formation in the Czech Republic. Contemporary Buddhism, 13(2), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639947.2012.719710

Dahl, S., & Eagle, L. (2015). Marketing ethics & society.

Fraňková, R. (2020). Czech NGO to support teaching of science in Little Tibet. Retrieved January 29, 2020, from Czech Radio website: https://english.radio.cz/czech-ngo-support-teaching-science-little-tibet-8109409

García, L. (2023). An Ecosystemic Approach to Human Rights Philanthropy. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 15(3), 678–684. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huad048

Himálajský patron. (2020). Věda do Tibetu. Retrieved January 22, 2020, from Brontosauři v Himálajích website: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cm6h03B9AA

King, S. B. (2009). Socially Engaged Buddhism. University of Hawai’i Press. https://doi.org/10.21313/hawaii/9780824833350.001.0001

Kolesinski, M. T., Nelson-Weaver, E., & Diamond, D. L. (2013). Digital solidarity in education: Promoting equity, diversity, and academic excellence through innovative instructional programs. In Digital Solidarity in Education: Promoting Equity, Diversity, and Academic Excellence through Innovative Instructional Programs. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203075265

Kolmasova, S. (2024). The Czech Republic: Human Rights Defender, Yet No R2P Champion. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 42(4), 524–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2023.2294613

Kowalski, B. (2022). Central and Eastern Europe, China’s Core Interests, and the Limits of Relational Politics: Lessons from the Czech Republic in the 2010s. East European Politics and Societies, 36(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325420952142

Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. In International Journal of Advertising (Vol. 29). https://doi.org/10.2501/S026504871020118X

Long, W. J. (2021). A Buddhist Approach to International Relations. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68042-8

Luayya, L., Hardjosoekarto, S., Herwantoko, O., & Muhammaditya, N. (2022). Digital Group Solidarity: Rethinking the Typology of Beckert’s Moral Embeddedness in the Contemporary Market Arena. Asian Journal of Business Research, 12(3), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.14707/ajbr.220138

Mantilla, J. (2022). Digital solidarity and migrations: analysis on the use of digital technologies among Venezuelan citizens in Quito, Ecuador. Estudios Fronterizos, 23. https://doi.org/10.21670/ref.2218102

McKenzie, J. S. (2015). Right business, right consumption: Controlling commodification and guiding consumption in a Tibetan Buddhist organisation in Scotland. Social Compass, 62(4), 598–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768615601976

Nolan, C. (2025). Philanthropy Is Changing — Governance Must Change, Too.

Nonprofit Tech for Good. (2017). 2017 Global NGO Online Technology Report. Retrieved from https://cep.org/blog/philanthropy-is-changing-governance-must-change-too/#:~:text=Philanthropy 1.0 is characterized by,the need for ongoing services

NP. (2024). The Ultimate List Of Charitable Giving Statistics For 2024. Retrieved from nonprofitssource.com website: https://nonprofitssource.com/online-giving-statistics/#:~:text=By the end of last,a regular basis (69%25).

NP. (2025). Online Giving Continues 6 Years Of Growth. Retrieved from nonprofitssource.com website: https://nonprofitssource.com/online-giving-statistics/online-fundraising/#:~:text=Online giving grew 12.1%25 in,for advertising on social media.

Pedersen, V. M. L. (2019). On the Anti-paternalist Project of Reconciliation. Utilitas, 31(1), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095382081800016X

Petzinger, J., & Jung, T. (2024). In reciprocity, we trust: Improving grantmaking through relational philanthropy. Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1840

Röntynen, R., & Tunkkari-Eskelinen, M. (2024). Voluntourism in the Context of Community-Based Tourism, and Regenerative Tourism: A Theoretical Exploration Focusing on Responsibility. Proceedings of the International Conference on Tourism Research, 7(1), 340–348. https://doi.org/10.34190/ictr.7.1.2019

Russo, M. (2024). Beyond the Dark Sides of the Web: For an Ethical Model of Digital Solidarity. Critical Horizons, 25(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/14409917.2024.2313436

Scoccia, D. (2010). The right to autonomy and the justification of hard paternalism. In Paternalism: Theory and Practice (pp. 74–92). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139179003.005

Starr, K. J. (2019). 5 facts about Buddhists around the world. Retrieved April 5, 2019, from Pew Research Center website: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/04/05/5-facts-about-buddhists-around-the-world

Thompson, C. J., Locander, W. B., & Pollio, H. R. (1989). Putting Consumer Experience Back into Consumer Research: The Philosophy and Method of Existential-Phenomenology. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.1086/209203

Trifan, C. A., & Dolezal, C. (2024). Digital voluntourism and sense of place: volunteers’ responsibility towards an ‘imaginary locality.’ Tourism Geographies, 26(8), 1293–1312. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2024.2412550

Úvod. (2025). O organizaci. Retrieved from Brontosauri v Himalajich website: https://www.brontosaurivhimalajich.cz/o-organizaci

Weiss, T. (2011). Projecting the re-discovered: Czech policy towards Eastern Europe. Perspectives, 19(2), 27–44. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84855471586&partnerID=40&md5=5fec33fa97dac129cdc001312450db5d

Published
2025-12-30
Section
Articles