Reframing Reality: Nāgārjuna’s Philosophy of Emptiness and Its Ethical Implications

  • Françoise Dastur Archives Husserl de Paris, France
Keywords: Buddhist Philosophy, Dependent Origination (Pratītyasamutpāda), Emptiness (Śūnyatā), Impermanence (Anicca), Ontology

Abstract

This study examines Nāgārjuna’s philosophical principles of impermanence (anicca) and emptiness (śūnyatā), focusing on their critique of essentialist metaphysics and relevance to contemporary global challenges. Centered on the doctrine of pratītyasamutpāda (dependent origination), the research explores Nāgārjuna’s vision of reality as dynamic and interconnected. Using qualitative library research, it analyses Nāgārjuna’s Mūlamadhyamakakārikā (The Fundamental Verses on the Middle Way) through the lenses of Buddhist philosophy, comparative metaphysics, and systems thinking. Findings reveal that Nāgārjuna’s rejection of intrinsic essence (svabhāva) and permanence (ātman) dismantles static ontological paradigms, offering a relational ontology aligned with systems thinking. This perspective addresses challenges like climate change, social polarization, and existential anxiety, proposing holistic solutions rooted in mindfulness, resilience, and compassion. By integrating Nāgārjuna’s insights into ethical and practical domains, the study highlights his timeless contributions to fostering sustainability and collective well-being. This research provides a robust critique of dualistic thinking while demonstrating the transformative potential of Nāgārjuna’s philosophy in creating a more harmonious and interconnected future

References

Bhaskar, V. S. (2009). Faith & philosophy of Buddhism. New Delhi: Gyan Publishing House.

Boell, S. K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2014). A Hermeneutic Approach for Conducting Literature Reviews and Literature Searches. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 34(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03412

Brincat, S. (2020). The Cosmology of Mādhyamaka Buddhism and Its World of Deep Relationalism. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37602-4_5

Burton, D. F. (2015). Emptiness Appraised. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315787343

Chowdhury, S. B. (2012). An Analytical Study Of The Concept Of Connection With Dependent Orginiation Sanjoy Barua Chowdhury Emptyness (Sūnyatā) Doctrine And Its. The Journal of The International Buddhist Studies College INTRODUCTION, 14–27.

Dahal, N. (2024). Buddhism in Nietzsche’s Critique: A Reassessment of Nihilism. Univerzita Karlova.

Demont-Biaggi, F. (2015). Wittgenstein and Buddhism? On Alleged Affinities with Zen and Madhyamaka. Comparative Philosophy, 6(1), 24–37.

Dhiman, S. (2019). Advaita Vedānta: The Science of Reality. In Bhagavad Gītā and Leadership (pp. 71–102). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67573-2_4

Divino, F. (2022). Appearance and Momentariness: The Nature of Being between Nāgārjuna, the Sarvāstivādins and Neo-Parmenidism. Comparative Philosophy: An International Journal of Constructive Engagement of Distinct Approaches toward World Philosophy, 13(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.31979/2151-6014(2022).130104

Enßlin, V. (2017). Nāgārjuna’s concept of emptiness in comparison with Schopenhauer and Aristotle. Prajñā Vihāra: Journal of Philosophy and Religion, 18(2), 22–38.

Gandolfo, S. (2016). The Positionless Middle Way: Weak Philosophical Deflationism in Madhyamaka. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 44(2), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-014-9259-y

Gironi, F. (2024). Zero and Śūnyatā: Likely Bedfellows. In The Origin and Significance of Zero (pp. 364–397). BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004691568_023

Gokhale, P. P. (2021). Buddhist Approaches to Impermanence: Phenomenal and Naumenal. Religions, 12(12), 1081. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12121081

Harvey, P. (2012). An introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, history and practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hayes, R. P. (1994). Nāgārjuna’s appeal. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 22(4), 299–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01095223

Ho, C. (2010). Nāgārjuna’s Critique of Language. Asian Philosophy, 20(2), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2010.484952

Jayesh, A. K. (2021). Nāgārjuna and the concept of time. Asian Philosophy, 31(2), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2021.1882723

Jones, R. H. (2020). On What is Real in Nāgārjuna’s “Middle Way.” Comparative Philosophy: An International Journal of Constructive Engagement of Distinct Approaches toward World Philosophy, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.31979/2151-6014(2020).110105

Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2001). Qualitative Communication Research Methods. London: Sage Publications.

Machado, L. N. (2016). Verdade E Vazio Em Nāgārjuna: O Capítulo Xxiv Dos Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia, 57(133), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-512X2016N13303lnm

McClintock, S. (2023). Six Verses from Nāgārjuna’s Lost Treatise Establishing the Transactional. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 51(3), 319–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-023-09536-6

Nath, R. (2018). The problem of self in Nāgārjuna’s philosophy: a contemporary perspective. AI & SOCIETY, 33(4), 537–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0702-y

Ng, E. C. H. (2024). Building a Global Community of Sustainability, Ethics, and Spirituality One Village at a Time: Plum Village as a Case Study. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41606-4_10

Pemananda, U., & Kuruppu, C. (2021). A Buddhist approach for a sustainable existence. In Foundations of a Sustainable Economy (pp. 81–95). Routledge: Routledge.

Westerhoff, J. (2016). On the Nihilist Interpretation of Madhyamaka. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 44(2), 337–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-014-9266-z

Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Traditions: epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European Journal of Education, 48(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12014

Published
2024-12-30
Section
Articles