Holistic Assessment in Buddhist Religious Education under the Kurikulum Merdeka: A Case Study of SD Metta Maitreya, Pekanbaru

  • Johnny Anwar Angkasa Institute Nalanda
Keywords: Holistic assessment, Buddhist moral education, teacher assessment literacy, Kurikulum Merdeka

Abstract

This study examines changes in assessment practices in Buddhist Religious Education following the implementation of the Kurikulum Merdeka, with particular attention to the shift from test-based assessment toward a holistic approach that evaluates students’ cognitive, affective, and behavioral development. The study responds to recent national education policy reforms in Indonesia that emphasize character formation and moral values, especially within faith-based schools. Employing a qualitative approach through a case study at SD Metta Maitreya in Pekanbaru, the research draws on classroom observations, in-depth interviews with teachers and students, and document analysis. The findings show a significant diversification of assessment practices through the use of affective rubrics, observation notes, reflective journals, portfolios, and narrative reports oriented toward the internalization of the values of metta and karuṇā. These changes foster positive student responses, as reflected in increased prosocial behavior, self-reflection, and moral awareness in everyday school life. The study demonstrates that holistic assessment functions not only as a tool for measuring learning outcomes but also as a pedagogical mechanism for cultivating a Buddhist moral ethos. Conceptually, this research contributes to the field of religious education by showing how learning evaluation serves as a practical space for the internalization of religious values within the policy framework of the Kurikulum Merdeka, while also highlighting the importance of teachers’ assessment literacy and institutional support in ensuring the sustainability of holistic approaches.

References

Ahmad Dhomiri, Junedi Junedi, & Mukh Nursikin. (2023). Evaluasi Afektif Pada Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di Sekolah. Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora, 3(1), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.55606/khatulistiwa.v3i1.971

Ajayi, V. O. (2017). Primary sources of data and secondary sources of data. Benue State University, 1(1), 1–6.

Alimuddin, J. (2023). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah KONTEKSTUAL, 4(02), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.46772/kontekstual.v4i02.995

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik.

Astuti, D. A., Haryanto, S., & Prihatni, Y. (2018). Evaluasi implementasi kurikulum 2013. Wiyata Dharma: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 6(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.30738/wd.v6i1.3353

Azizah, I. Z., Solihin, L., Nuraini, F., Nur, S. P., Joko, H. R., K., B. G., … Pradhia. (2024). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka dan Peningkatan Kemampuan Literasi dan Numerasi Peserta Didik. Jakarta: Pusat Standar dan Kebijakan Pendidikan Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Budiyanti, M., Mujiyanto, & Darma, W. (2023). KEMAMPUAN GURU PENDIDIKAN AGAMA BUDDHA DALAM IMPLEMENTASI KURIKULUM MERDEKA DI SMK. Jurnal Muara Pendidikan, 8(2), 354–362. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52060/mp.v8i2.1310article

Febrianningsih, R., & Ramadan, Z. H. (2023). Kesiapan Guru dalam Pelaksanaan Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(3), 3335–3344. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v7i3.4686

Harikrishnan, U., & Sailo, G. L. (2022). Assessment of Prosocial Behaviour of School-Going Adolescents. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 47(3), 453–455. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_1285_21

Indriati, L., Mai, N., & Tan, H. Y.-J. (2024). Enhancing Authentic Assessment in Large-Class Design Education Through Authentic Project-Based Learning. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(9), 432–452. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.9.22

Jarvis, P. (2013). From Adult Education to the Learning Society. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203015988

Kamalasari, D., Remiswal, & Khadijah. (2025). Pelaksanaan Penilaian Afektif dalam Evaluasi Pembelajaran terhadap Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di SD Adabiah Padang. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Dan Riset Pendidikan, 3(4), 743–753. https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v3i4.646

Klechaya, R., & Glasson, G. (2017). Mindfulness and place-based education in buddhist-oriented schools in Thailand. In Weaving complementary knowledge systems and mindfulness to educate a literate citizenry for sustainable and healthy lives (pp. 159–170). Springer.

Lean, G., & Barber, W. (2022). Authentic Assessment in Higher Education: Applying a Habermasian Framework. European Conference on E-Learning, 21(1), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecel.21.1.913

Mertler, C. A. (2009). Teachers’ assessment knowledge and their perceptions of the impact of classroom assessment professional development. Improving Schools, 12(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480209105575

Pastore, S. (2023). Teacher assessment literacy: a systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1217167

Poindexter, K., Hagler, D., & Lindell, D. (2015). Designing Authentic Assessment. Nurse Educator, 40(1), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000091

Rahmadayanti, D., & Hartoyo, A. (2022). Potret Kurikulum Merdeka, Wujud Merdeka Belajar di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 7174–7187. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3431

Singh, J. (2017). Education (Buddhism). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0852-2_208

Sucipto, S., Sukri, M., Patras, Y. E., & Novita, L. (2024). Tantangan Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka di Sekolah Dasar: Systematic Literature Review. Kalam Cendekia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/jkc.v12i1.84353

Sugiyono. (2001). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&B (Alfabeta, ed.). Bandung.

Sutini, S., Muawanah, M., & Paramita, P. R. (2023). Kesulitan Guru dalam Menerapkan Kurikulum Merdeka pada Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Buddha dan Budi Pekerti di Sekolah Dasar Atisa Dipamkara 1. Vijjacariya: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pendidikan Buddhis, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.69835/vjp.v10i1.298

Villardón-Gallego, L., García-Carrión, R., Yáñez-Marquina, L., & Estévez, A. (2018). Impact of the Interactive Learning Environments in Children’s Prosocial Behavior. Sustainability, 10(7), 2138. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072138

Wagemaker, E., Hofmann, V., & Müller, C. M. (2023). Prosocial behavior in students with intellectual disabilities: Individual level predictors and the role of the classroom peer context. PLOS ONE, 18(2), e0281598. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281598

Willis, J., Adie, L., & Klenowski, V. (2013). Conceptualising teachers’ assessment literacies in an era of curriculum and assessment reform. The Australian Educational Researcher, 40(2), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-013-0089-9

Wu, M. Y.-H., Chien, C.-Y., Huang, S.-Y., Chen, H.-C., & Huang, S.-J. (2025). The Effects of Social-Emotional Learning Program for Preschool Children on Prosocial Behaviors and Problem Behaviors. Bulletin of Educational Psychology. Taiwan. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202506_56(4).0001

Yunita, Y., Zainuri, A., Ibrahim, I., Zulfi, A., & Mulyadi, M. (2023). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar. Jambura Journal of Educational Management, 4(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37411/jjem.v4i1.2122

Published
2025-12-31
Section
Articles